If our justice system truly does what it says it does, it helps people rehabilitate, and it doesn’t just stick them in jail and punish them. It finds a way to help that person heal and be a better person helps them find their way back to society in a way that they feel welcomed, productive and truly healed. If all that is true and the person is truly healed, and they’ve changed your life and death, we can trust them again. Why do we have a sex offender registry? Where the social dilemma truly comes in. It isn’t about it did the system work? Do we need a failsafe? We should not be condemning the sexual offender registry but should we question it. How do we really need to deal with those people who wouldn’t want to harm others in our society, and especially harm our most vulnerable or most vulnerable being? Those who can’t defend themselves because either they’re too young to defend themselves? Or because they have an inability to defend themselves or maybe because the elderly have trouble defending themselves. So this registry was originally designed to let people know who was living in their neighbourhood that might want to harm them or their children. Is it a fair assessment? How do we actually deal with that? We have people living, living outside of jail, that could want to do us harm. It has been a question in my mind for a long time and it’s been a question in a lot of people’s minds when you consider that they get a notification. This type of person could be moving into your neighbourhood. And you see protests happen. You see people saying that they don’t want that in their neighbourhood. And that’s understandable. You want your neighbourhood to be safe for your children to be able to go out and play safe for where mom to walk up to the store and walk back again and not worried about being attacked, and safe for you to go out to your car, climb in commute to work and not have to worry about what is happening in your front or back yards. Kind of a simple request satellite, isn’t it? But not so simple to deliver. So we’re going to hear from the people who actually put these laws in place and they and who helps develop these rules that would put a registry in place and how is going to develop it into laws that will keep us all safe.
From the Federal Lawmakers
This web page deals with topics that may cause distress. If you or someone close to you needs support, we encourage you to reach out. Resources are available at canada.ca/mental-health.
On April 26, 2023, government legislation was introduced in Senate. The aim of this legislation is to strengthen the National Sex Offender Registry and make the criminal justice system more responsive to the needs of victims.
The proposed changes focus on three elements:
- Responding to a Supreme Court of Canada decision to ensure that the National Sex Offender Registry remains operational and can continue to be used as an effective tool to prevent and investigate sexual crimes, while respecting the Charter of Rights and Freedoms through changes to the automatic registration criteria for sexual offenders;
- Empowering victims and improving the law on publication bans by requiring judges to:
- ask the prosecutor if victims want a publication ban
- clarify the process for modifying or revoking a ban
- Requiring judges to ask the prosecutor if victims want to receive information about their case after sentencing.
Changes to the National Sex Offender Registry
On October 28, 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its ruling in R. v. Ndhlovu. The Court found that two elements of the Criminal Code related to the National Sex Offender Registry were inconsistent with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Specifically, the Court struck down the provisions that required automatic registration for everyone convicted of, or found not criminally responsible for, a designated sexual offence, as well as the provision requiring mandatory lifetime registration for some offenders. The Court found these provisions inconsistent with section 7 of the Charter, which guarantees everyone the right to life, liberty and security of the person.
The Court gave Parliament one year to respond to the decision on automatic registration. Without new legislation, the National Sex Offender Registry after October 28, 2023, will effectively cease to be operational, as it will not be possible for courts to order sexual offenders to register and comply with the Registry.
The proposed legislative changes respond to the Court’s decision by making the following changes to the criteria for automatic registration on the National Sex Offender Registry:
Automatic registration for:
- child sex offenders sentenced to two or more years in prison, when the Crown proceeds by indictment;
- any repeat offender who has previously been convicted of a sexual offence;
- any offender who has previously been ordered to register on the National Sex Offender Registry
All other sexual offenders would be required to register unless they can demonstrate to the court that registering would not meet the purpose of the Registry, which is to help police prevent or investigate sexual crimes, or that registering would have a grossly disproportionate impact on them.
- judges would be able to impose lifetime registration for sexual offenders who are found guilty of more than one offence at the same time, if the offender poses a risk of re-offending.
- registered sex offenders who intend to travel will be required to provide 14 days’ advance notice prior to their travel departure;
- registered sex offenders must report every address at which they will be staying during their travels, and;
- those found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder would be able to apply to be removed from the registry if they are deemed to not pose a significant risk to public safety, which includes their prospect of reoffending.
Addition of new offences for which registration with the National Sex Offender Registry may be required.
The courts would be able to order registration in additional circumstances:
- cases of non-consensual sharing of intimate images;
- cases where the Crown proves that extortion was committed with the intention of committing a sexual offence (i.e., sextortion)
The proposed legislation would also ensure aggravated sexual assault against a person under 16 is no longer excluded from the list of offences for which registration may be required.
Changes to publication bans to respond to concerns of victims
Publication bans are a useful tool to shield the identity of victims and witnesses and protect them from further harm. For cases involving sexual offences, judges must on request, order a publication ban to prevent the publication of the name of victims or any information that could identify them.
Publication bans aim to protect victims and encourage them to come forward to report their cases. However, our Government recognizes that victims have diverse needs and that the criminal justice system must be flexible and ensure that victims are treated with dignity and respect. We have heard from some victims that publication bans do not go far enough to protect them, especially where information is online, before the publication ban is ordered. Other victims do not want a publication ban or do not want it in place indefinitely. Some victims feel silenced by the inability to speak about their case publicly. We have heard that the process for lifting a publication ban is both unclear and difficult to navigate.
The proposed changes would:
- amend section 486.4 of the Criminal Code to require judges to ensure that reasonable steps have been made to ask victims if they would like a publication ban before ordering one;
- amend sections 486.4 and 486.5 of the Criminal Code to clarify the process for lifting a publication ban; and
- ensure that previously published and archived information is covered by publication bans.
These changes would respond to the concerns of victims who have asked for their views to be taken into consideration when seeking publication bans, while at the same time ensuring that publication bans continue to be available to those who want them.
Changes to victims’ right to information about their case
Under the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights, all victims in Canada have the right to information. The Government of Canada has heard concerns from victims and stakeholders about the difficulties victims can face when trying to access information through the criminal justice process.
Victims do not systematically receive information about the case unless they request it. Some victims will want certain types of information, others will not.
The proposed changes would:
- amend the Criminal Code to require judges to ensure that victims have been asked if they would like to receive information about the case post-sentencing;
- allow victims to indicate on their Victim Impact Statement whether they wish to receive information to which they are entitled post-sentence; and
- require courts to provide victims’ contact information to the Correctional Service of Canada to ensure victims properly receive the information they request.
Some victims wish to receive ongoing information about the offender who harmed them. This information could include the length of the offender’s sentence and its start date, when an offender might be eligible for parole, release conditions, and appeals of release decisions.
Empowering victims to make choices based on their particular needs and what will work for them is a trauma-informed practice. Victims would also be able to choose not to receive information if that is their preference.
Please Visit Our Sponsors